杨光毅的回答：AI-ArtificialIntelligence"isthehardestkindofmovietoreview-butit'salsothemostenjoyablekindofmovietowatch.It'sbeenoverthreeweekssincemyscreeningofStevenSpielberg'semotionallyharrowingepicaboutarobotboy.Beforewritingmyreview,Iwantedtoletitsthemes,content,andcharacterssinkintomyheadandmakeasolidimpact.ThefilmwasbasedonanideabyStanleyKubrick,butwhenhediedin1999,Speilbergtookchargeoftheproject.IcouldspendpagesdiscussingthetechniquesofKubrick'sintentionsandSpielberg'sdecisions,butIwillnot.StanleyKubrickandStevenSpielbergaretwoofthegreatestdirectorsAmericancinemahastooffer;it'spurepleasurewatchingtheirideasclashandflow.Iamnotgoingtoexamineeachindividualthemehere,either.Thatwouldruinthemovieforyou. "AI-ArtificialIntelligence"presentsmanythemesonscreen,butit'simportanttotakewhatyougetoutofit.WheneverIreadareviewofKubrick's"AClockworkOrange"or"2001:ASpaceOdyssey"Ifeelinfluencedbythereviewer'sinterpretationofthemovie'sthemes.EverytimeIwatcheitherofthosemoviesIgetsomethingnewoutofit.Ihateitwhenothercriticsstatethemovie'sthemesonpaperasifit'safact.Thereisfartoomuchroomforinterpretationtorevealthismovie'smessage,orthemessageofanyKubrickfilmforthatmatter.Ask100people,andyoumightget100differentanswers."AI-ArtificialIntelligence"isthatkindofmovie-oneoftheyear'sbest. Criticsandaudiencesalikehavetornapartthismovie'sending-aclearmiscalculationbySpielberg.IfKubrickwereincharge,themoviewouldhavecalleditquitsabouttwentyminutesearlierinanunsettlingsequencethattakesplaceintheocean.ButSpeilberg,whoalwaysseemsentrancedbysciencefiction,injectsanadditionalsegmentintothemixthatdoesnotworkquiteaswell,butisn'tsocompletelyawfulthatitdeservessuchharshcriticism.Itstillleavesuswithanopen,startledemotionaldisorientation.Ileftthetheaterwithtearsinmyeyes.Themoviebeforetheconclusionissocomplex,moving,andinvolvinginsomanydifferentwaysthelasttwentyminutesdidn'tevencomeclosetospoilingthemovieforme. "AI"transpiressometimeinthenearfutureafterthepolaricecapshavemeltedandfloodedcoastalcitiesandreducednaturalresources.Mechanicalandroidshavebecomepopularsincetheyrequirenocommodities.Reproductionhasalsobecomehighlyillegal.Machinesprovidesexualservicesandifanyonewantsachild,theywillpurchasearobot.However,thedifferencebetweenarobotchildandalivingchildisthatrobotscannotlove.That'sthetaskprofessorHobby(WilliamHurt)ofCybertronicsManufacturinghassolved.Hehasmadearobotchildthatcanlove. Wecanseparate"AI"intotwoseparatesegments.Idonotwanttorevealtoomuchabouteachplotbecausethepleasureofwatchingthismovieevolvesfromtherevealingoftheconnectingplots.Iwill,however,brieflysaythefirstdetailsarobotchild'sinteractionwithinafamily,andtheseconddealswiththerobot'sestrangementfromitsfamilyandthequesttoregainthemother'slove. IcanimaginethematerialinKubrick'shands.Themovie'sopeningscenehasafemalerobotbegintoundressinapublicoffice.Speilbergcutstheactionbeforesherevealsanyexplicitnudity.Kubrickwouldhavehadvariousshotsoffullfrontalnudity.Spielberg,nevercomfortablewithsexualmaterial,leavesoutmuchofthemotivationbehindKubrick'sideas.Oneofthebiggestproblemsin"AI"isthelackofedgewiththesexualcontent.JudeLawplaysarobotgigolowholivesinasexfantasycalledRougeCitywherepeoplefromeverywherecometoseeksexualsatisfaction.Thecentralcharacter,arobotboyplayedbyHaleyJoelOsment,motivateseveryactioninthestoryexceptforthescenesinRougeCity.Whycontainsuchaperversecharacterandsettingwhenhisentireexistencesimplydisplaysamoodthathasalreadybeenwellestablished.Obvious,thefilmmakerstonedtheaspectsof"AI"downtowarrantagutlessPG-13rating-butwhy?Themovieisn'tappropriateforchildrenanyway,andit'sfartoocomplex.UndoubtedlyifKubrickwereincharge"AI"wouldhavetobere-cuttoavoidanNC-17rating.Spielbergshouldhaveeithertakenadvantageoftheperversematerialorcompletelyeliminatedit. HereIam,doingexactlywhatIsaidthatIwouldn'tdo,andatnearly900words,Istillhavenotclearlyexpressedmyownopinionsonthefilm.IhavemanynotesinfrontofmythatdisplaymyreactionasIwatchedthefilm,butIamnotgoingtousethem-theyrevealtoomuchaboutthemovie."AI"isaverypersonalfilm,adeeplymoving,scientific,careful,andharrowingmotionpicturethatdisplaysstartlingtalentonscreenandbehindthescenes.Thespecialeffectsareextraordinary.Theperformancesarealarming-theimmenselytalentedHaleyJoelOsmentmayonceagainbeupforanAcademyAwardnomination.Goseethemovie,thentalkaboutitwithothers.It'sthekindoffilmthatyoucanspendhoursthinkingabout,thengoseeitagain. 张刚的回答：AI-ArtificialIntelligence"isthehardestkindofmovietoreview-butit'salsothemostenjoyablekindofmovietowatch.It'sbeenoverthreeweekssincemyscreeningofStevenSpielberg'semotionallyharrowingepicaboutarobotboy.Beforewritingmyreview,Iwantedtoletitsthemes,content,andcharacterssinkintomyheadandmakeasolidimpact.ThefilmwasbasedonanideabyStanleyKubrick,butwhenhediedin1999,Speilbergtookchargeoftheproject.IcouldspendpagesdiscussingthetechniquesofKubrick'sintentionsandSpielberg'sdecisions,butIwillnot.StanleyKubrickandStevenSpielbergaretwoofthegreatestdirectorsAmericancinemahastooffer;it'spurepleasurewatchingtheirideasclashandflow.Iamnotgoingtoexamineeachindividualthemehere,either.Thatwouldruinthemovieforyou. "AI-ArtificialIntelligence"presentsmanythemesonscreen,butit'simportanttotakewhatyougetoutofit.WheneverIreadareviewofKubrick's"AClockworkOrange"or"2001:ASpaceOdyssey"Ifeelinfluencedbythereviewer'sinterpretationofthemovie'sthemes.EverytimeIwatcheitherofthosemoviesIgetsomethingnewoutofit.Ihateitwhenothercriticsstatethemovie'sthemesonpaperasifit'safact.Thereisfartoomuchroomforinterpretationtorevealthismovie'smessage,orthemessageofanyKubrickfilmforthatmatter.Ask100people,andyoumightget100differentanswers."AI-ArtificialIntelligence"isthatkindofmovie-oneoftheyear'sbest. Criticsandaudiencesalikehavetornapartthismovie'sending-aclearmiscalculationbySpielberg.IfKubrickwereincharge,themoviewouldhavecalleditquitsabouttwentyminutesearlierinanunsettlingsequencethattakesplaceintheocean.ButSpeilberg,whoalwaysseemsentrancedbysciencefiction,injectsanadditionalsegmentintothemixthatdoesnotworkquiteaswell,butisn'tsocompletelyawfulthatitdeservessuchharshcriticism.Itstillleavesuswithanopen,startledemotionaldisorientation.Ileftthetheaterwithtearsinmyeyes.Themoviebeforetheconclusionissocomplex,moving,andinvolvinginsomanydifferentwaysthelasttwentyminutesdidn'tevencomeclosetospoilingthemovieforme. "AI"transpiressometimeinthenearfutureafterthepolaricecapshavemeltedandfloodedcoastalcitiesandreducednaturalresources.Mechanicalandroidshavebecomepopularsincetheyrequirenocommodities.Reproductionhasalsobecomehighlyillegal.Machinesprovidesexualservicesandifanyonewantsachild,theywillpurchasearobot.However,thedifferencebetweenarobotchildandalivingchildisthatrobotscannotlove.That'sthetaskprofessorHobby(WilliamHurt)ofCybertronicsManufacturinghassolved.Hehasmadearobotchildthatcanlove. Wecanseparate"AI"intotwoseparatesegments.Idonotwanttorevealtoomuchabouteachplotbecausethepleasureofwatchingthismovieevolvesfromtherevealingoftheconnectingplots.Iwill,however,brieflysaythefirstdetailsarobotchild'sinteractionwithinafamily,andtheseconddealswiththerobot'sestrangementfromitsfamilyandthequesttoregainthemother'slove. IcanimaginethematerialinKubrick'shands.Themovie'sopeningscenehasafemalerobotbegintoundressinapublicoffice.Speilbergcutstheactionbeforesherevealsanyexplicitnudity.Kubrickwouldhavehadvariousshotsoffullfrontalnudity.Spielberg,nevercomfortablewithsexualmaterial,leavesoutmuchofthemotivationbehindKubrick'sideas.Oneofthebiggestproblemsin"AI"isthelackofedgewiththesexualcontent.JudeLawplaysarobotgigolowholivesinasexfantasycalledRougeCitywherepeoplefromeverywherecometoseeksexualsatisfaction.Thecentralcharacter,arobotboyplayedbyHaleyJoelOsment,motivateseveryactioninthestoryexceptforthescenesinRougeCity.Whycontainsuchaperversecharacterandsettingwhenhisentireexistencesimplydisplaysamoodthathasalreadybeenwellestablished.Obvious,thefilmmakerstonedtheaspectsof"AI"downtowarrantagutlessPG-13rating-butwhy?Themovieisn'tappropriateforchildrenanyway,andit'sfartoocomplex.UndoubtedlyifKubrickwereincharge"AI"wouldhavetobere-cuttoavoidanNC-17rating.Spielbergshouldhaveeithertakenadvantageoftheperversematerialorcompletelyeliminatedit. HereIam,doingexactlywhatIsaidthatIwouldn'tdo,andatnearly900words,Istillhavenotclearlyexpressedmyownopinionsonthefilm.IhavemanynotesinfrontofmythatdisplaymyreactionasIwatchedthefilm,butIamnotgoingtousethem-theyrevealtoomuchaboutthemovie."AI"isaverypersonalfilm,adeeplymoving,scientific,careful,andharrowingmotionpicturethatdisplaysstartlingtalentonscreenandbehindthescenes.Thespecialeffectsareextraordinary.Theperformancesarealarming-theimmenselytalentedHaleyJoelOsmentmayonceagainbeupforanAcademyAwardnomination.Goseethemovie,thentalkaboutitwithothers.It'sthekindoffilmthatyoucanspendhoursthinkingabout,thengoseeitagain. |
